Skip to content

Initiative grants small research awards to four UW graduate students

Two students work collaboratively on a project while seated at a tableThe Civic Health Initiative has awarded four grants of $2,000 each to University of Washington graduate and postdoctoral researchers working to generate new knowledge that strengthens civic health, democracy and the structures that support it.

These awards are intended to help cover research expenses associated with dissertations, thesis fieldwork or independent projects conducted under the supervision of a faculty advisor, mentor or principal investigator. The period of performance for these projects is one year.

The four awardees and their projects are:

  • Ryan DeCarsky of the College of Arts & Sciences for a project investigating how queer communities and clinicians in the San Francisco Bay Area collaboratively reshape sexual health care in the era of PrEP, DoxyPEP and U=U, demonstrating how queer practical knowledge can inform more equitable, responsive and democratically engaged health systems.
  • Mark Nepf of the Evans School of Public Policy & Governance for a project examining how environmental justice can be advanced through collaborative environmental management by analyzing how organizational differences among the 28 National Estuary Programs shape equitable community engagement in watershed governance.
  • Julia Simoes of the College of Arts & Sciences for a project examining how dialogic pedagogy can strengthen collaborative practice and civic health in diverse Colorado communities by developing, implementing and evaluating a dialogic capacity‑building series for community mobilizers engaged in upstream violence‑prevention and systems‑change work.
  • Arielle Weaver of the Evans School of Public Policy & Governance for a project investigating how the racial identity of Black probation officers shapes their discretionary decision‑making within a highly racialized criminal legal system, illuminating how community supervision influences democratic inclusion, public trust and the civic health of marginalized communities.

More information about the Civic Health Initiative’s graduate student and postdoctoral scholar small research awards program can be found by visiting its program page.

Initiative awards four research grants to teams of UW faculty members

Audience engages with a speaker in an outdoor settingThe Civic Health Initiative announced the award of four grants worth $25,000 each to teams of University of Washington faculty members, plus community partners, from the Bothell, Seattle and Tacoma campuses.

“The breadth and depth of the project ideas that we received in response to this funding call was inspiring,” shared Ed Taylor, the UW’s vice provost and dean of Undergraduate Academic Affairs, and co-lead for the Civic Health Initiative. “We are pleased to support these teams as they develop new research innovations in areas such as youth civic education and leadership, strengthening local civic engagement and guiding decision making about environmental stewardship.”

These research awards help faculty members and PI-eligible research staff to generate preliminary data or proof-of-concept to pursue follow-on funding or further develop their ideas.

“We were particularly pleased by the range of academic fields that applied,” added Jodi Sandfort, dean of the UW’s Evans School of Public Policy & Governance and the other co-lead for the Initiative. “Interest from all three of our campuses underscores the role each of us can play in revitalizing civic health and bolstering democratic institutions across the country.”

Descriptions of each of the four funded projects are included in the following sections.

Project team
Veronica Cassone McGowan, Director of the Collaborative for Socio-Ecological Engagement, UW Bothell
David Stokes, Emeritus Professor, School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences, UW Bothell
Scott Morrison, Finn Hill Neighborhood Alliance

Project summary
Communities in the Kenmore and Kirkland areas of Washington State are experiencing rapid urban development alongside grassroots, community-led restoration efforts. These changes directly affect ecological systems, access to nature, and community well-being, yet residents and local organizations often lack accessible tools to understand and respond to these impacts.

This project will create a community-engaged, AI-assisted wildlife monitoring program that connects civic health, environmental stewardship and undergraduate education at UW Bothell. Undergraduate students will be trained to deploy wildlife cameras, manage large image datasets and use artificial intelligence tools to analyze wildlife presence and habitat use across sites experiencing development and restoration, and will crosscheck and train AI tools for ethical and accurate use as data.

Students will work in partnership with local organizations to interpret results and communicate findings in accessible formats for community use to guide decision-making around land conservation, restoration and policies regarding trail development and use. By integrating AI, community partnerships and place-based learning, the project strengthens civic health by increasing community access to environmental data, supporting evidence-based restoration and building shared knowledge about local ecosystems. At the same time, it broadens students’ understanding of civic and environmental careers, demonstrating how technology, data and community engagement can work together to address local challenges. The project will generate both practical monitoring tools and a replicable model for community-centered, technology-enabled environmental action.

Project team
Nic Weber, Associate Professor, Information School

Project summary
Local governments across the United States invite public comment as a core mechanism of democratic input. Yet research consistently shows that the people who show up to speak are unrepresentative of broader community opinion. The result is a distorted public record – residents who follow local affairs encounter a narrow, often polarized slice of their neighbors’ views and mistake it for the whole. This kind of misperception, known as pluralistic ignorance, has measurable consequences.

When people believe their opinions are marginal, they lose confidence that participation can influence government action, and they disengage. Recent experiments demonstrate that correcting analogous misperceptions in partisan contexts can meaningfully shift attitudes and behavior, yet no work has tested whether correcting community-level misperceptions can restore engagement in local civic life.

Our project addresses this gap. We have designed a survey experiment we call Civic Mirror, built around a predict-then-correct framework. For several local policy topics, participants (1) share their own view, (2) predict the distribution of opinions among their neighbors, and (3) see the actual distribution alongside their prediction. We will deploy Civic Mirror with approximately 500 participants across four cities in Washington and Michigan. We contribute a scalable experimental platform for testing whether correcting pluralistic ignorance at the local level can strengthen political efficacy and increase intentions to participate in local government.

Project team
Huatong Sun, Professor of Culture, Arts, & Communication, UW Tacoma
Belinda Louie, Professor of Education, UW Tacoma

Project summary
There is an urgent need for effective scam-prevention resources for marginalized communities. Federal Trade Commission reports older adults in the U.S. lost $2.4 billion to financial fraud in 2024. As scams increasingly operate as a global enterprise enhanced by Generative AI, immigrant communities are targeted through scams delivered in their native languages.

This pilot project cultivates critical AI literacies among UWT undergraduate students and empowers them to become influential voices in a transdisciplinary ecosystem of AI for the public good. In partnership with the Chinese Community Center of Tacoma, we launched a community-engaged experiential learning program this quarter to create community resources for scam-prevention efforts, including social media campaigns and toolkits, community workshop materials and a project website. These design prototypes will be refined across multiple communication courses, with support from student workers. Community
workshops will be delivered in the summer, and the social media campaign and website will be launched in the fall, followed by evaluation.

Through fieldwork and a critical design process, students will gain essential AI literacies on scams and social media influencer skills, enabling them to become thought leaders who promote public understanding of AI and strengthen community resilience. We seek seed funding for pilot community-engaged activities. The project’s outcomes will inform future proposals to major funders (e.g., NSF, NEH) and help adapt the resulting scam-prevention resources to additional marginalized communities. Aligned with the initiative’s mission, this project will enhance the community’s civic health, foster future change-makers and clear the path to civic participation.

Project team
Christine Keating, Associate Professor of Gender, Women & Sexuality Studies

Project summary
This project partners with Escuela Popular Norteña to pilot a youth civic education and leadership initiative centered on Hispano youth in the Taos Valley region of northern New Mexico. Young people in the region face persistent structural barriers to civic participation shaped by economic inequality, cultural marginalization, community outmigration and limited local employment opportunities. At the same time, Hispano communities in the Taos Valley sustain longstanding traditions of cultural continuity, intergenerational knowledge sharing and community leadership that offer powerful foundations for youth civic engagement.

The project will establish youth civic learning labs where participants collectively examine the social, economic and environmental challenges shaping their lives while developing community-based civic and economic initiatives. Drawing on popular education traditions, the program centers collaborative learning, community dialogue and youth leadership development. Participatory arts practices will support reflection, relationship-building and civic learning.

The project will culminate in a public community education and dialogue event designed to foster intergenerational connection and strengthen young people’s civic participation and efficacy. Research activities will generate pilot data examining how culturally grounded popular education strengthens youth civic identity, leadership development, and community engagement, producing a curriculum, leadership toolkit, and evaluation framework to support future external funding and program expansion.

More information about the Civic Health Initiative Research Awards program can be found by visiting its program page.

Initiative awards three teaching and curriculum grants to UW instructors

The Civic Health Initiative announced the award of three small grants worth $2,000 each to University of Washington instructors from the Bothell, Seattle and Tacoma campuses.

The purpose of these teaching and curriculum awards is to support UW instructors who have innovative proposals that approach civic health, civic engagement and democracy through new curricular perspectives, methods and activities. The funded curricular topics ranged in focus from creating paths to civic participation, juvenile justice and climate education.

The three projects that were funded during this cycle are described in the following tabs.

Project team
Anne Taufen, Professor, School of Urban Studies, UW Tacoma

Project summary
This project is scoping for a UW study-abroad course with Ecuador partner (USFQ), focused on sustainable development, global environmental change, and community health. UWT in Galapagos: Global Flows, Local Impacts is community-engaged, interdisciplinary, and aligned with multiple degree pathways. It will offer a three-week immersion in Ecuador (Quito and San Cristobal, Galapagos) followed by one week of intensive integration and synthesis UW Tacoma.

The course will foster future change makers in creating paths to civic participation, with a community engaged learning component in Galapagos and the opportunity to work directly with neighborhood groups, public agencies, and NGOs. After orientation in Quito, we will fly to San Cristobal in the Galapagos Islands, the very heart of the history of modern biological observation and systems-based understanding of scientific evolution.

Staying in USFQ faculty housing in San Cristobal, environmental conditions and community health resources will be evaluated for inclusion in the course – with attention to impacts of rapid mainland urbanization, intense tourism, strong military presence, and significant resource disparities among island inhabitants and cosmopolitan visitors (Ecuadoran and international). Potential excursions will be assessed for Summer 2027 UWT program, considering safety, feasibility, cost and alignment with learning outcomes.

Project team
Ann Frost, Associate Teaching Professor, College of Arts & Sciences

Project summary
The Youth Empowerment Program will engage Law, Societies, and Justice students in the work of learning about the rights of juveniles in Washington State, training in educating juveniles about their rights and running workshops to inform and educate juveniles and school administrators.

Washington State is unique in that the state legislature has passed laws (i.e., Youth Access to Counsel (YAC)) that specifically seek to protect juveniles during inherently coercive interactions with law enforcement. There is no mechanism designed to inform students, or administrators at their schools, about this legislation or the rights afforded to children in this state.

As part of the Youth Empowerment Project, LSJ students will first learn about juvenile justice, the rights afforded to juveniles in Washington State, and the circumstances that the law seeks to protect them from, including coercive interrogations, false confessions and wrongful criminal charges.

Lawyers from the state Office of Public Defense who administer the YAC law will train the LSJ students in running workshops to educate and inform juveniles and school administrators about these rights. The LSJ students will then visit local middle and high schools to run educational workshops, likely as part of state-required civics days.

Project team
Veronica Cassone McGowan, Director, Collaborative for Socio-Ecological Engagement, UW Bothell
Maddie Iem, Program Manager, Collaborative for Socio-Ecological Engagement, UW Bothell

Project summary
Through this project, we will adapt 4–6 climate-centered children’s books into accessible learning tools that include communication boards, interactive elements, and embedded discussion prompts. Preservice education interns will co-design these materials as part of their coursework and supervised professional learning experiences.

We will assemble backpack learning kits that pair adapted books with simple place-based climate engagement activities focused on carbon, energy use and community observation. Materials will be piloted through professional learning workshops and integrated into UW Bothell science methods courses. Feedback from families, educators and interns will inform iterative refinement of the materials.

More information about the Civic Health Initiative Teaching and Curriculum Awards program can be found by visiting its program page.

Exploring how innovation inequality helps to shape American politics

Image of the Seattle skyline looking towards the Space NeedleWith America’s political polarization constantly in focus, pundits and politicians have long debated its root causes. Many have argued that social and cultural differences are to blame, but a new book, U.S. Innovation Inequality and Trumpism: The Political Economy of Technology Deserts in a Knowledge Economy, by a University of Washington researcher argues that the true division correlates to economic and technological disparities.

In the book, UW professor Victor Menaldo teamed with recent UW doctoral graduate Nicolas Wittstock to explore how America’s divides between its high-tech hubs, such as Silicon Valley, and less innovative regions, may have led to the rightwing populist movement. The authors propose that “innovation inequality” was crucial towards Donald Trump’s rhetoric in 2016, as voters in regions that felt left behind by the modern knowledge economy gravitated towards Trump.

The authors then look at the 2020 election, which saw a shifting political landscape, with big tech taking footholds in traditionally blue-collar areas in states such as Georgia and Arizona, which flipped to Joe Biden. This shift reinforces the notion that “innovation inequality” plays a crucial role in shaping American politics.

Learn More >

Initiative awards five research grants to teams of UW faculty members

Audience engages with a speaker in an outdoor settingThe University of Washington Civic Health Initiative announced the award of five grants worth $25,000 each to teams of University of Washington faculty members, plus community partners, from the Bothell and Seattle campuses.

The purpose of these research awards is to support UW faculty members in developing new research innovations for activities and projects that seek to revitalize civic health and bolster democratic institutions across the country

The five projects that were funded during this award cycle touch on topics ranging from open-records laws to the role of community assemblies to reducing barriers to civic participation.

Descriptions of each of the projects are included in the following sections.

Project team
Matthew Powers, Professor of Communication
Patricia Moy, Christy Cressey Professor of Communication
Adrienne Russell, Mary Laird Wood Professor of Communication

Project summary
Passed in the 1960s and 70s, open-records laws in the United States were crafted to enable public oversight of government activities, under the assumption that most users would be journalists. Today, at both federal and state levels, the number of requests has skyrocketed – yet news organizations constitute fewer than five percent of public-records requesters.

To better understand this disconnect, our study examines the nature of public-records requests and their impact on requesters, public agencies, and democratic governance. We pose three specific research questions: Who uses public-records requests? For what ends? And with what consequences for democratic oversight? In order to answer these questions, we will: (1) request and analyze records requests to the Washington State Department of Ecology; (2) conduct interviews with its public-records officers and managers as well as the journalists who made the requests; and (3) analyze news articles based on these requests. Answering these questions is critical to renewing and strengthening open-records laws so they better serve their original goal: enabling journalists and other stakeholders to exercise democratic oversight in the public interest.

Our findings should inform efforts by our community partner, the Washington Coalition of Open Government, that allow systems to better serve journalists as well as advocates and civil-society groups working in the public interest. In doing so, it will contribute to the renovation of a key measure whose aim is to make government agencies more responsive to public oversight and input.

Project team
Marie Spiker, Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology
Jennifer Otten, Professor, Department of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences
Sarah Collier, Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences
Jillian Youngblood, Executive Director, Civic Genius

Project summary
Civic health is thwarted by public discourse that tends to highlight polarization and overlook common ground. For example, while many perceive polarization about climate change’s existence, only 11% of Americans are doubtful of climate change. We lack nationally representative data to help us to identify common ground on food topics. Food has the potential to be a great unifier—the idea of breaking bread to strengthen social ties is nearly universal—but food is also increasingly at the heart of political debates and divides. Headlines highlight disagreements over rising food prices, public spending on food assistance, Farm Bill funding, food additive regulation, and more. These areas are complex, and we need nuanced reporting that results in action instead of impasse.

Our long-term vision is for an interdisciplinary research collaboration that combines national surveys, qualitative research, journalist workshops, and deliberative democracy methods to leverage food-related issues as a source of common ground to cultivate greater civic health. In the short term, funds from this Civic Health Award will catalyze this work and increase the likelihood of future funding by enabling us to (1) develop, field, and analyze data from a national survey of US consumers and (2) conduct focus groups with local Washington journalists.

These findings will provide insights on: Where do Americans have common ground on consequential food-related issues? How can an understanding of this common ground guide journalists in more effective communication on complex topics? And how can recent WA legislative investments in local journalism be leveraged for civic health?

Project team
Cory Struthers, Assistant Professor, Evans School of Public Policy & Governance
Esther Min, Director of Research, Front and Centered

Project summary
Environmental and social justice policies often include provisions to strengthen community input in decisions that affect them. Co-governance is a promising approach, wherein communities and government co-create policies and programs. However, there is growing evidence that co-governance may reinforce systemic inequalities, limiting the voices of those who are furthest from economic well-being.

In 2024, the Washington State Legislature allocated $2 million to pilot community assemblies as a form of co-governance, designed to counter common patterns of exclusion. While government is involved, community-based organizations lead and design the process, aiming to (i) develop community-driven recommendations, and (ii) strengthen their long-term civic capacity. Our proposed research will identify the mechanisms through which community assemblies foster these outcomes, examining the eight community assemblies piloted in Washington state. We will use process tracing, combined with systematic content analysis, to trace how participants’ civic capacity and assembly recommendations develop during assemblies. This analysis leverages evidence, including participant surveys, meeting transcripts, notes, and interviews.

Funding from the Civic Health Initiative would support analysis and data collection, including interviews to reinforce inferences from process tracing. The community assembly model is timely, as scholars and practitioners reckon with exclusion challenges in other forms of co-governance. Washington state’s pilot assemblies are a unique opportunity to examine their efficacy, and understand the mechanisms through which they meet their goals. Findings will be used to develop a theory change that informs future research and evaluation on co-governance, including community assemblies in and beyond Washington state.

Project team
Amy Zhang, Assistant Professor, Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering
Ruotong Wang, PhD student, Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering
Sam Wong, Global Innovation Exchange

Project summary
Online civic discussions are important for shaping local policies, yet participation remains skewed towards dominant and expert voices. Politically disengaged individuals often hesitate to contribute due to their perception of the lack of expertise in the issue. While prior scaffolding approaches like structured pros and cons or ideation prompts have shown promise in encouraging participation, they often lack personalization and scalability.

This project explores how large language models can enable personalized scaffolding at scale to support more inclusive civic discourse. We propose an online discussion platform that integrates two key components: (1) Interactive Summaries to help users quickly make sense of ongoing conversations, and (2) Personalized Reflection Nudges that helps users reflect on the existing discussion and themes. These nudges are tailored to the user’s interaction with the discussion, their comment drafts, and their viewing history. We will create novel LLM workflows by leveraging techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to generate these summaries and nudges.

To evaluate how these features impact the comment writing process, we will conduct both a controlled lab study and a real-world deployment in collaboration with civic deliberation platforms such as ConsiderIt. In both studies, we will assess the effectiveness of our approach by rating the (1) Comment Quality such as content relevance to the discussion and references to earlier comments, (2) Reflection capacity measured with the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) and (3) User satisfaction with the nudges. This work contributes new methods for lowering participation barriers in civic discourse and offers practical design insights for building inclusive, LLM-supported discussion platforms.

Project team
Ying Yang, Assistant Professor, UW Bothell School of Business

Project summary
This 12-month pilot project investigates how AI-augmented peer feedback systems can motivate Generation Z students to develop civic knowledge, trust-building skills, and collaborative mindsets—key attributes of civic-minded leadership. While Gen Z students care about social issues, many are disengaged from traditional civic education due to perceived lack of relevance or motivation. This study integrates behavioral economics and educational research to test whether structured peer evaluation— augmented by AI feedback—can enhance student engagement and civic learning.

The project will be embedded in a university course where students submit work on civic or policy topics, evaluate peer submissions, and receive feedback from both peers and an AI tool. The intervention compares student outcomes across sections with and without AI-generated prompts, testing whether augmented feedback increases critical thinking, civic identity, and perceived relevance of civic issues. The approach promotes “learning by evaluating,” where students gain insight through evaluating others’ work—a model supported by cognitive learning theory.

Data collection will include surveys, quizzes, and analysis of student feedback to assess learning gains, feedback quality, and changes in civic attitudes. The pilot will demonstrate proof-of-concept for a scalable civic-learning model and support future proposals for longitudinal studies or broader curricular integration across the UW system. The project aligns with the Civic Health Initiative’s mission to prepare civic-minded leaders and scale inclusive, accessible civic education.

More information about the Civic Health Initiative Research Awards program can be found by visiting its program page.